Marguerite de Bressieux: the Legend and the Truth

After I posted the Marguerite de Bressieux entry on Twitter, it kind of exploded. I’d posted up all the info I had about it, with a big, “I don’t know if this is true” at the end. While the story was fishy — the lack of contemporary corroboration and the direct quotations raise an eyebrow — I tended to believe it was true. This was largely due to several 19th century French historians writing about her, concrete evidence that her father Georges existed, and the specificity of exact dates and names attached. I figured there were likely older documents I didn’t have access to, which could prove or disprove it. Basically, I’d done as much as I could.

Thankfully, a couple historians chimed in with some additional info.

First came Roger McCarthy, who thought this sounded like a pseudohistory and attacked the idea that 19th century historians could get this right. He linked to genealogy websites that indicated that the Bressieux line had died out before Marguerite was born, although this also wasn’t exactly conclusive.

More conclusive was this thread from Yvonne Seale, who managed to find a 17th century mention of her, which paints a far different story:

In this version, Marguerite died shortly after the assault – whether by her own hands or from her injuries is left vague. Seale points out that the next author to pop up was Alfred de Bougy, a writer of historical fiction. I didn’t go by Bougy’s account, but it seems likely that Tranchant and Ladimir did in 1866.

That seems about as much info as we’ll get on this one! I’ve updated the entry to reflect that it was a legend, and will be doing similar to the pictures inside of it once I get a second.

One Response to “Marguerite de Bressieux: the Legend and the Truth”

  1. RogerMcC

    Wasn’t attacking notion that 19th century historians could get this right but pointing out that just because a 19th century writer says something does not mean it is historical fact – unless that writer can cite or otherwise be cross-referenced to a contemporary or near-contemporary source (and as Yvonne pointed out not even a 17th century source is contemporary to a 15th century event).

    And I didn’t just cite genealogical websites but a properly sourced and probably accurate French wikipedia article that states quite unequivocally that the family had died out by 1417 (yes wikipedia is never a 100% reliable source but I can’t see in this particular case why anyone would make up a whole load of what appear to be legitimate citations to very boring genealogical tomes).

    Anyway I am not a French medieval historian but do know enough to be able to tell whether something looks deeply improbable – which this story sadly does. And Yvonne who is a proper medievalist would appear to agree.